We're building a team that will research and mitigate extreme risks from future models.
This team will intensively red-team models to test the most significant risks they might be capable of in areas such as biosecurity, cybersecurity risks, or autonomy. We believe that clear demonstrations can significantly advance technical research and mitigations, as well as identify effective policy interventions to promote and incentivize safety.
As part of this team, you will lead research to baseline current models and test whether future frontier capabilities could cause significant harm. Day-to-day, you may decide you need to finetune a model to see whether it becomes superhuman in an eval you've designed; whiteboard a threat model with a national security expert; test a new training procedure or how a model uses a tool; or brief government, labs, and other research teams. Our goal is to see the frontier before we get there.
We're currently hiring for ourCBRN workstream, with an emphasis on biosecurity risks(as outlined in our Responsible Scaling Policy). By nature, this team will be an unusual combination of backgrounds. We are particularly looking for people with experience in these domains:
Biosecurity: You're a biologist who's concerned about the implications of AI development. You're an academic who researches biosecurity defense. You have experience modeling biological phenomena or developing advanced threat modeling simulations.Science: You're an ML researcher who builds agents to augment chemistry or biology research. You've built a protein language model and you enjoyed looking through the embedding space. You're a team lead at an ML-for-drug discovery company. You've built software for astronauts or materials scientists.Evaluations: You've managed a large-scale benchmark development project, in AI or other domains. You have ideas about how AI and ML evaluations can be better.For this job posting, you can apply to one of two tracks: Research Scientist or Research Engineer.
Do not rule yourself out if you do not fit one of those categories - it's plausible the people we're looking for do not fit any of the above! If you think about the most significant upsides and downsides of AI, and you can do good research to get glimpses of what those look like, please consider applying.
Please note: We will only be considering candidates who can be based in the Bay Area for this role. We have a strong preference for candidates who can start ASAP, and ideally by February 2025. ResponsibilitiesIndependently lead small research projects while collaborating with team members on larger initiativesDesign, run, and analyze scientific experiments to advance our understanding of large language modelsWork with external partners to develop novel evaluations to accurately assess the biosecurity implications of our modelsFor Research Scientists:Synthesize biosecurity research to establish thresholds of concern for AI capabilitiesDevelop a framework for how we might assess the impact of AI on biosecurityCommunicate our findings to external stakeholders, such as policymakersFor Research Engineers:Lead technical design discussions to ensure our infrastructure can support both current needs and future research directionsInterface with, and improve our internal technical infrastructure and toolsPartner closely with researchers, data scientists, policy experts, and other cross-functional partners to advance Anthropic's safety missionYou may be a good fit if youHave one of:For the Research Scientist track: Advanced degree (MS or PhD) in the biological sciences (Molecular Biology, Computational Biology, Bioengineering) or 4+ years of professional experience in biology research (including wet-lab) and some familiarity with machine learning or software engineering (Python preferred)For the Research Engineer track: Professional work experience in software engineering or machine learning and interest or past exposure to biosecurityTake pride in writing clean, well-documented code in Python that others can build uponHave a track record of using technical infrastructure to interface effectively with machine learning modelsHave familiarity with prompting and engineering large language modelsAre able to balance research goals with practical engineering constraintsHave strong problem-solving skills and a results-oriented mindsetHave excellent communication skills and ability to work in a collaborative environmentPick up slack, even if it goes outside your job descriptionPrefer fast-moving collaborative projects to extensive solo effortsCare about the societal impacts of AIStrong candidates may also have experience withWet lab experience in molecular biologyHave previous experience leading large projects with multiple external collaborators or stakeholdersPrevious experience with developing evaluations or benchmarks for large language modelsFamiliarity with GPUs, Kubernetes, and OS internalsExperience with language modeling using transformer architecturesPrevious experience in emerging technology policy, including in biosecurity or AIRepresentative projectsDesign and implement a new evaluation to test models for CBRN risksManage a large-scale automated evaluations run across our clustersDevelop a detailed threat model of CBRN risks, and identify how core bottlenecks can be resolved from further evaluationsPrepare briefing materials to share the results of an evaluation run with external research groupsCandidates need not havePrevious professional experience in AI Safety100% of the skills needed to perform the jobDeadline to apply:None. Applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis.
#J-18808-Ljbffr